Prince Harry has faced another significant blow as he finds himself excluded from Sandhurst’s prestigious list of top 200 alumni. The omission has been branded as a snub by a high-ranking Army commander, adding a new layer of humiliation to the Duke of Sussex’s recent experiences. This exclusion stands in stark contrast to his brother, Prince William, who not only secured a spot on the coveted list but also penned the forward to the exclusive guide.
Even more noteworthy is the fact that James Blunt, the renowned singer, managed to secure a place in the pages of “They Also Served” for his military service before transitioning to a successful music career. The California-based Royal now finds himself in the company of military outcasts, including infamous figures like fascist leaders Oswald Mosley and Benson Freeman.
Former British Army Commander Richard Kemp, shedding light on the exclusion, mentioned, “I completely understand why he’s not been included. I probably would have included him on balance, but it’s not a disappointment to not see him in there.” Kemp speculates that recent tensions within the royal family may have played a role in the decision to exclude Prince Harry.
One notable aspect that could have contributed to the exclusion is Harry’s controversial comments and actions during his time at Sandhurst. The Duke of Sussex faced criticism for filming discriminatory remarks towards his colleagues and ditching an army memorial service for a Disney Premiere to pitch a voice-over gig for his wife.
Authors VOR and Kent Payne, responsible for “They Also Served,” emphasized that not everyone who trained at Sandhurst was deemed a “good egg.” Payne acknowledged the presence of a “smattering of traitors and cads” among the alumni, highlighting the complexity of evaluating military service.
This exclusion comes nearly a year after the release of Prince Harry’s explosive memoir, where he boasted about attacking 25 fighters and portrayed a perspective on war that raised eyebrows even among fellow veterans. The omission from Sandhurst’s top 200 serves as a resounding message, challenging the narrative that Prince Harry has cultivated around his military heroism.
For Harry, who has often clung to his military identity, this snub represents the ultimate insult. In a year that has already seen him linked with controversial figures and faced with the harsh realities of life beyond the royal confines, the exclusion from Sandhurst’s notable list adds another layer of complexity to his narrative.
In conclusion, Prince Harry’s omission from Sandhurst’s top 200 is a poignant moment that underscores the complexities of evaluating military service and the challenges of reconciling a public persona with the realities of one’s actions. As an insider with extensive knowledge on the issue, it’s evident that this exclusion marks a significant chapter in Prince Harry’s journey, prompting reflection on his past and the way forward.