So, the big update: Harry just scored a tiny win in his endless UK security fight. The Court of Appeal says parts of his challenge over his protection setup will be hush-hush—no press, no public. When I read that, I nearly sprayed my coffee everywhere. Are you serious? The guy who ditched royal duties, spilled family tea on Netflix, and wrote Spare to air every private convo now wants privacy for his security case? The hypocrisy is off the charts!

Mark your calendars—his appeal’s set for April 8th and 9th in London. You know the drill: Harry’s pouty face will be plastered everywhere, rocking that victim vibe he’s nailed down pat. Headlines will scream, “Will Meghan join Harry in London?” Spoiler alert: Nope. She’s been dodging the UK like it’s a haunted house—knows the welcome mat’s long gone.

What’s frying my brain here is the double standard. The court’s cool with open chats on basic facts, but anything “sensitive” about security? Closed doors. How convenient! When Harry’s hawking books or docuseries, it’s all fair game—family secrets, dirty laundry, you name it. But when it’s something he wants under wraps? Suddenly it’s “sensitive security matters.” Give me a break.

And let’s tackle the biggie: Is Harry getting a leg-up because he’s King Charles’ kid? You bet he is—100%. We saw it with his redacted U.S. visa case, and now this special treatment in UK courts. Regular folks wouldn’t get this kind of privacy pass—Harry’s banking on royal perks while trashing the system that handed them to him. It’s maddening!

This appeal’s next week, and I’d bet my last biscuit Harry’ll play the victim card again—cue the furrowed brow and pained stare. But don’t hold your breath for him owning up to how his own choices landed him here. Nope, not his style. Which brings up a spicy theory you’ve been tossing around: Is the Palace—or even King Charles—quietly pulling strings for him? I wouldn’t put it past them. Harry’s torched plenty of bridges, but blood’s thick, and Charles might be working some backroom magic despite the public cold shoulder.So, what’s Harry really after with this security push? Is it legit safety worries, or just a status flex? That IP (Internationally Protected Person) tag screams “still royal, still special”—even after he bailed on the gig. It’s like quitting your job but demanding the company car and VIP parking. Compare that to William and Kate—facing insane pressure this year, especially with her health scare, yet they’re all class and grit. No lawsuits, no whining, no Netflix tell-alls—just showing up for duty. King Charles, battling his own health stuff, keeps the crown first. That’s royalty: service over self, not self-service.

Harry’s security saga ticks me off because he acts like he’s been wronged when he’s had every advantage in the book. Born into royalty, top-tier education, a platform to change lives—he even rocked it with Invictus Games back in the day. But then something shifted, and let’s be real: a lot of us pin that on a certain ex-Suits star strolling into his life. Pre-Meghan, Harry was the cheeky, lovable prince. Now? Bitter, combative, always the victim. A longtime royal fan hit me up last week saying, “Ben, it’s like watching a mate get dragged down by someone who’s not in his corner.” Spot on, right?

The saddest bit? The rift with his family. Harry and William were tight—brothers bonded by royal craziness and losing Diana. Now they’re ghosts to each other. Imagine how that guts King Charles or Kate, who seemed to adore her brother-in-law. All for what? A California move, Netflix cash, a busted Spotify deal, and some overpriced “mental fitness” powder? Worth it, Harry?

Next week’s court showdown will be a circus, but let’s keep it real: Harry’s still living large—a $14 million Montecito pad, millions in the bank, a cushy life most can’t touch. This security he’s begging for? Just another cherry on his entitlement sundae, even after he walked away from the royal grind.

KINDLY CLICK HERE TO JOIN OUR WHATSAPP COMMUNITY FOR FREE, GET THE LATEST ON THE GO HERE