Prince Harry has been battling to reverse a decision that saw his security downgraded after he ceased being a working Royal and relocated – famously – to the California with wife Meghan. The 40 year old has long expressed his concerns about safety, which have stopped him from bringing his wife and two children Archie and Lilibet to the UK.

However, it was revealed earlier this week that he had lost his latest fight to overturn the decision. While royals such as King Charles, Queen Camilla, and the Kate and William, the Prince and Princess of Wales, are granted full-time police protection, other family members do not enjoy this privilege – a situation Harry believes should be the case for him on visits to the UK.

‌

‌

However, other Royal Family members who don’t have round-the-clock protection in the UK. Prince Andrew forfeited his state-funded security when he withdrew from Royal duties in 2019, reports the Express.

Similarly, Princess Beatrice, 36, and Princess Eugenie, 35, do not receive security as they are not working royals. The sisters once had police protection costing £500,000 annually, but this was withdrawn by the late Queen Elizabeth II in 2011 amid a row over expenses.

In 2010, the now-King Charles reportedly voiced concerns about Eugenie’s significant security costs while she was travelling during her gap year.

Another of the King’s nieces, Zara Tindall, also lacks police protection as she, like Eugenie and Beatrice, is not a working Royal. Princess Anne, Prince Edward and Sophie, Duchess of Edinburgh are among the royals who do not have round-the-clock security.

The siblings of the King and his sister-in-law only receive protection when they are carrying out official duties. Here’s the complete list of royals without the protection that Harry is insisting on:

KINDLY CLICK HERE TO JOIN OUR WHATSAPP COMMUNITY FOR FREE, GET THE LATEST ON THE GO HERE